Psychology Verified Ph.D. Review

WEEK 7 PSYCH DQ 2:   DECISION MAKING Would you flip a coin... | Psychology

Research Requirement:

DECISION MAKING Would you flip a coin for the chance of winning two dollars? What if you were given a dollar and offered the chance to flip a coin to either gain a second dollar or lose the first? Which wager seems more appealing—the first or the second? Far more people choose the first wager than the second. Both scenarios have exactly the same probability of outcomes: a 50% chance of ending up with nothing, and a 50% chance of ending up with two dollars. Why might the first wager appeal to people? Do we always make the best possible decision? Impediments are factors that can hinder decision making. While they often vary by situation, common impediments exist that might influence decision making in general. In this Discussion, you explain a difficult decision you have made. You also describe impediments that you faced when making this decision, as well as common decision-making impediments. Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.  Post a brief description of a recent difficult decision you made between two or more alternatives. Then explain the nature of two impediments that you faced in making the decision. Finally, describe two common impediments to optimal decision making. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. RESOURCES/REFERENCES   Bonner, B. L. (2004). Expertise in group problem solving: Recognition, social combination, and performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and PracticeLinks to an external site., 8(4), 277–290. Burns, K., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decision making and free will: A neuroscience perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the LawLinks to an external site., 25(2), 263–80. Johansson, P., Hall, L., Silkstrom S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. ScienceLinks to an external site., 310(5745), 116–119. Osman, M. (2008). Positive transfer and negative transfer/antilearning of problem-solving skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralLinks to an external site., 137(1), 97–115. Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends in Cognitive ScienceLinks to an external site., 10(3), 108–116. Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological BulletinLinks to an external site., 135(1), 94–120. Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of PsychologyLinks to an external site., 60, 53–85
Expert Dissertation Preview for WEEK 7 PSYCH DQ 2:   DECISION MAKING Would you flip a coin... | Psychology
Thesis Icon

Master Thesis Solutions

Full Scholarly Analysis & Citations

APA 7th Ready Ph.D. Verified Seminal Works Included

Why Postgraduate Students Trust Us

01. Deep Scholarly Search

We don't just use Google Scholar. We access premium databases to find the high-impact journals your supervisor expects.

02. Critical Engagement

Our writers provide genuine synthesis and critique, moving beyond simple summary to show true academic mastery.

03. Zero Plagiarism Policy

Every literature review is written from scratch. We provide a full Turnitin report to guarantee the originality of your work.

04. 24/7 Ph.D. Support

Our support team understands postgraduate rigor and is available around the clock to assist with your thesis requirements.

Research FAQ: Psychology

How can I use this literature review sample properly?

Use this sample as a guide for thematic organization, scholarly tone, and citation density. Observe how our experts link different studies to build a cohesive argument. Do not copy it directly; instead, use it to inspire your own original research.

Can you help with a Dissertation Proposal in Psychology?

Yes. We specialize in research proposals. We can help you define a gap in the literature, formulate robust research questions, and outline a methodology that will satisfy even the most rigorous academic committee.

What is the standard turnaround time for a Master's thesis chapter?

Standard dissertation chapters (3,000-5,000 words) typically require 4-7 days for thorough research and scholarly writing. For the literature review chapter, more time is often needed to ensure an exhaustive search of sources.

Further Reading & Similar Studies

Psychology

Reply 2-1 js

Reply to: Most Nonexperimental designs can describe behaviors, but cannot explain behaviors, and are used in situations in which an experiment is not practical or desirable (Myers, & Hansen, 2012). There are, however, both advantages and disadvantages to each approach:   Naturalistic observation is a descriptive method of study where one observes behavior as it happens naturally (Myers, & Hansen, 2012). This approach is often used in studies of animals in the wild and in captivity. When observing animals in their natural habitat, a difficult but important task is to try to stay hidden, as anim...

Psychology

HUM 5100 Week 2 Anotated Bibliography

see attached HUM5100Week2Assignmentinstructions.docx Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the  How to Create an Annotated Bibliography video. Additionally, refer to the final project description for your Research Proposal Project final paper in Week 6 to ensure that the articles you are selecting are appropriate for the final project. HUM5100: Week 02 How to Create an Annotated Bibliography Transcript Download HUM5100: Week 02 How to Create an Annotated Bibliography Transcript A concise and focused annotated bibliography is a crucial research tool. Fo...

Psychology

APA FORMAT. DOCTORATE LEVEL, Please use at least Include at least five scholarly sources. 500 WORDS MINIMUM

PLEASE INCLUDE SCHOLARLY SOURCES For this Discussion, consider current controversies in the diagnosis of personality disorders, with specific attention to borderline personality disorders and antisocial personality disorders. Additionally, think about how culture and gender influences the diagnosis of personality disorders. a brief explanation of how culture and gender may influence diagnoses of clients with personality disorders. Then, explain one controversy associated with the diagnosis of women with borderline personality disorder and one controversy associated with the diagnosis of antis...

Psychology

87127-3

A challenge for many novice researchers is knowing how to use theory. As we do research, we often have theories about what will work and what won’t work, because that’s how our minds operate:  finding order, patterns, and relationships, in other words, making sense of sensory data as it comes in. As scholars, we test theories and modify them, generate new theories, and abandon theories that are no longer useful.

Psychology

DQ : see attached | Psychology

see attached DiscussionBoard8.docx Discussion Board #8: Informative Speech Organization Examples LAST WEEK:  You browsed through examples of informative presentations to get a sense of the presenter's type of speech, subject choice, and purpose. Now, we'll use the organizational information introduced during the PK presentations to build your understanding of how presentations are put together.  Organizational Examples : Review the following resource on idea organization to complete this week's post: · · Organizational Patterns for Informative Speaking  ...

Psychology

DISCUSSION 4335

a.  Fromm, Rogers, and Maslow all discuss the nature of human needs. Select any two of these theorists and compare and contrast their views on needs as influences on personality and functioning as discussed by Allen (2016).

Psychology

PSY6802 Week 8 – Signature Assignment: Customize a Solution for an Educational Issue

Begin this assignment by interviewing (by phone, email, or in person) a current K-12 teacher to obtain their thoughts on a specific education situation of interest to you that is adversely affecting students and/or teachers. Be sure to address assessment in your conversation. After your conversation, conduct outside research to demonstrate how pervasive the situation is by citing reports, articles, or case studies that identify the existence of this problem.

Psychology

WEEK 2

=p(X≤80andX≥125)=p(X≤80)+p(X≥125)=p(X≤80andX≥125)=(.09175)+(.04745)=p(X≤80andX≥119)=.00435=p(X≤80 and X≥125)= p(X≤80)+p(X≥125)=p(X≤80 and X≥125)= (.09175)+(.04745)=p(X≤80 and X≥119)= .00435<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" alttext="math"><mtable columnalign="left"><mtr><mtd><mo>=</mo><mi>p</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>≤</mo><mn>80</mn><mtext> </mtext><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>d</mi><mtext> </mtext&...

Psychology

Research Report PowerPoint Presentation

Appendices: two figures, OR two tables, OR a table and a figure. For example, set up a table focusing on participants, include your individually created survey, use/cite tables from a previous study, refer to Chapter 14 summary table, include Informed Consent figure and/or Debriefing Form figure. If unsure, contact your instructor for confirmation of appendices.