week 3 reply 535: Responses | Criminal

Research Requirement:

Responses 535week3reply.docx 1 5 100 words reply each Class 535 Discussion #1 reply to Ron The main reason why the time value of money is used in public sector budgeting and financial decision-making is recognition that money changes value over time. As Chen, Weikart, and Williams (2015), state, “a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow because the dollar today can be put to work”, earning income through investment or interest. Therefore, the time value of money is critical when making decisions about long-term projects, as it incorporates the opportunity cost of capital and the impact of inflation on cash flows in the future. In long-term public investments, such as environmental programs, infrastructure projects, or education initiatives, the time value of money allows us to compare costs and benefits in different time periods-because the future spending is always less valuable than present spending, the future benefits are also less so. To compare the two, the analysts use the time value of money to discount future value to present value. Techniques such as net present value or internal rate of return allow public managers to determine whether benefits of a long-term project outweigh costs. For example, a city government that is considering a $20 million upgrade to a wastewater treatment plant that is expected to save money and have an environmental benefit over the 20-year period would need to determine whether these savings, when presented in present dollars, are worth $20 million. If the future savings are presented in future dollars, the decision would be easier, but the city would not understand the true cost of the investment. Without using the time money concept, the governments would be making project justification based on nominal dollars, potentially approving projects that do not generate enough cash in the future to compensate them for the time, lost income from capital, and opportunity costs of the spending. Moreover, it creates inability to make use of more administration-friendly cash accounting methods. Instead, governments would have to decide on each penny spent individually with no regard to whether or not the spent dollars earn money in the future as they have no tools of deciding how much money is worth based on when it can be made. The time value of money promotes feasible and fair budgeting by helping to measure investing in long-term projects in future-saving terms today while ensuring taxpayers’ money is used to invest in opportunities efficiently and fairly over time. Reference Chen, G. G., Weikart, L. A., & Williams, D. W. (2015). Budget tools: Financial methods in the public sector (2nd ed.). CQ Press. Discussion #1 reply 2 Yolonda The time value of money (TVM) is important in long-term project decisions because it shows that the value of money changes over time. A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future because it can be invested to earn interest or returns. This means that when governments or organizations plan long-term projects, such as new roads or buildings, they must consider how the value of money will change during the project’s life (Chen, Weikart, & Williams, 2014).      Using the time value of money helps managers compare costs and benefits that happen at different times. For example, if a city spends $2 million now on a new bridge but expects to save $3 million in repairs and maintenance over the next ten years, TVM helps calculate whether those future savings are really worth more than the money being spent today. This is done through discounting, which converts future cash flows into their present value so decision-makers can see the real worth of those future benefits (Chen et al., 2014).      If the time value of money is ignored, an agency might think a project will make money when, in reality, inflation and lost investment opportunities reduce its actual value. According to Brigham and Ehrhardt (2017), the TVM concept is essential in budgeting and investment because it ensures that funds are used wisely and that projects provide true long-term benefits. In short, understanding the time value of money allows public managers to make better, fairer, and more responsible financial choices for the community. References Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017).  Financial Management: Theory & Practice(15th ed.). Cengage Learning. Chen, G. G., Weikart, L. A., & Williams, D. W. (2014).  Budget Tools: Financial Methods in the Public Sector (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.  https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781483324050 Responses to discussion 1: Reflect on your peer’s view of the time value of money. Do you agree with their assessment of its importance in long-term project decisions? Share your perspective and provide an example of how this concept influences decision-making in real-world projects. Discussion #2 reply to Ron Another vital factor in a line-item budget is that each expenditure category, such as salaries, utilities, and supplies, must be listed separately. This type is thus one of the most transparent but inflexible models for budgeting. At the same time, preparing a line-item budget also includes inflationary adjustments. As Chen, Weikart, and Williams (2015), note, inflation is the process of reducing the real value of money over time, which means that the same monetary quantity will buy a smaller quantity of goods and services in the future. Therefore, if the impact of inflation is not accounted for, then the agency’s operational capability will be reduced, even if the nominal budget remains sluggish.  When a member questions whether or not it is necessary to have inflationary increases, it is imperative to clarify that these increases do not mean new spending or new programs; they allow the organization to do the same amount of service as last year. For example, imagine if utility costs increased by 4%, the price of health insurance for our employees increased by 6%, and the cost of supplies increased due to market inflation, the budget did not increase, and the only alternative was to reduce the service or have fewer resources. A practical way to communicate this message is to use actual examples. For example, one can say, “We need modest increases in our budget to maintain the same activities, which is analogous to your household costs going up when the prices of groceries or gasoline go up.” Furthermore, the administrator may also share historical inflation data and some cost indices, such as the Consumer Price Index, which is a federal measure of inflation. These general budget moderation discussions will build trust and understanding, all while upholding the value of the agency’s financial plan. Reference Chen, G. G., Weikart, L. A., & Williams, D. W. (2015). Budget tools: Financial methods in the public sector (2nd ed.). CQ Press Discussion #2 reply to eric In a line-item budget, inflationary adjustments are necessary to maintain the purchasing power of appropriated funds from one fiscal year to the next. As Chen, Weikart, and Williams (2014) explain, the purpose of these adjustments is not to expand programs or services but to sustain the same level of operational capacity amid rising costs of goods and services. Inflation erodes the real value of money over time, meaning that even if nominal appropriations remain unchanged, the agency’s ability to procure supplies, pay for contracted services, and compensate personnel effectively decreases. To explain this to a member or policymaker questioning the need for increases, it is important to emphasize that inflationary adjustments represent cost maintenance, not expansion. For example, if inflation rises by 4%, maintaining last year’s $1 million operating budget without adjustment would result in an effective 4% reduction in purchasing power. Essential items such as fuel, utilities, and equipment would cost more, forcing the agency to either cut back on services or reallocate funds from other critical areas. Chen et al. (2014) note that these baseline adjustments are vital to ensure continuity of operations and prevent deterioration in service quality or response capacity. Moreover, as Mikesell (2021) highlights, inflation affects both input costs (such as labor and materials) and capital costs(such as debt service and replacement expenses). Failure to account for inflation may lead to deferred maintenance, workforce attrition, or inefficient cost-cutting measures that can undermine long-term fiscal sustainability. Presenting inflation as an economic reality measured by indices such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Producer Price Index (PPI) helps decision-makers view budget increases as necessary to maintain stable service delivery rather than as discretionary growth. In this way, inflationary adjustments in a line-item budget reflect prudent financial stewardship that preserves, rather than expands, operational capability. References Chen, G. G., Weikart, L., & Williams, D. (2014). Budget tools: Financial methods in the public sector (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. Mikesell, J. L. (2021). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. Responses to discussion 2: Review your peer’s explanation of inflation’s impact on the budget proposal. Do you agree with their approach to addressing the member’s concern? Offer your own strategy for explaining why inflation adjustments are necessary, and share how you would communicate this effectively.