Law Verified Ph.D. Review

Law BRIEF: ROUGH DRAFT ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Research Requirement:

BRIEF: ROUGH DRAFT ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW So far in this course, all assignments have focused on an objective view of the facts and cases. You have read and drafted case briefs that have objectively examined the facts and law of a case. Then, you drafted an objective, predictive office memo. Now, we are going to switch gears from being an objective observer to being an advocate. You will continue with the same cases with which you have been working for this assignment. Nothing about the law will be changing. The only change you will be making is switching from objective to persuasive writing for a client. A brief, contrary to its description, is not brief at all. It is a persuasive argument presented to a court. Briefs are filed by the attorneys, generally in an appellate court. The brief outlines and explains the issues, facts, law, and analysis that the court will need to perform. However, each side will file a brief with the court that takes all of this information and presents it in a persuasive manner. The great news is that you have already done a lot of hard work(SEE ATTACHED PREDICTIVE MEMO PRIOR WORK). You have read and briefed all of the cases that you will use for this assignment. You have even drafted a discussion section with all four of the rule explanation paragraphs you need. However, now you are going to switch from being objective to being persuasive. For the brief, you will use the same information but will become an advocate for your client. At this point, you have already examined the law. Thus, your focus now should be on crafting logical and reasoned arguments for your client. INSTRUCTIONS Follow the format that has been included in the prompt (SEE ATTACHED-JONES BRIEF PROMPT)J provided by your professor. This includes the headings and sections. Make sure your brief is:  3 to 5 pages in length.  Does not include a cover page or running heads.  Single-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font  Uses the same four rule explanation paragraphs as your memo. However, make sure to incorporate the feedback provided by your professor in the memo. o Two rule explanation paragraphs in the first section of the argument. o Two rule explanation paragraphs in the second section of the argument.  Includes two rule application paragraphs o One rule application paragraph at the end of the first section of the argument. o One rule application paragraph at the end of the second section of the argument.  Cite cases using the Bluebook in-text citation method  Only the four assigned cases should be used – no outside sources. Here are the cases:  1-Derby v. Derby, 378 S.E.2d 74 (Va. Ct. App. 1989)  2-Galloway v. Galloway, 622 S.E.2d 267 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)  3-Sims v. Sims, 55 Va. App. 340 (2009) 4-Chaplain v. Chaplain, 682 S.E. 2d 108 (Va. Ct. App. 2009). Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. DO NOT USE AI TO WRITE THIS, IT MUST BE WRITTEN BY A HUMAN, I WILL CHECK. TURNITIN WILL CHECK AS WELL.
Expert Dissertation Preview for Law BRIEF: ROUGH DRAFT ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Thesis Icon

Master Thesis Solutions

Full Scholarly Analysis & Citations

APA 7th Ready Ph.D. Verified Seminal Works Included

Why Postgraduate Students Trust Us

01. Deep Scholarly Search

We don't just use Google Scholar. We access premium databases to find the high-impact journals your supervisor expects.

02. Critical Engagement

Our writers provide genuine synthesis and critique, moving beyond simple summary to show true academic mastery.

03. Zero Plagiarism Policy

Every literature review is written from scratch. We provide a full Turnitin report to guarantee the originality of your work.

04. 24/7 Ph.D. Support

Our support team understands postgraduate rigor and is available around the clock to assist with your thesis requirements.

Research FAQ: Law

How can I use this literature review sample properly?

Use this sample as a guide for thematic organization, scholarly tone, and citation density. Observe how our experts link different studies to build a cohesive argument. Do not copy it directly; instead, use it to inspire your own original research.

Can you help with a Dissertation Proposal in Law?

Yes. We specialize in research proposals. We can help you define a gap in the literature, formulate robust research questions, and outline a methodology that will satisfy even the most rigorous academic committee.

What is the standard turnaround time for a Master's thesis chapter?

Standard dissertation chapters (3,000-5,000 words) typically require 4-7 days for thorough research and scholarly writing. For the literature review chapter, more time is often needed to ensure an exhaustive search of sources.

Further Reading & Similar Studies

Law

Post 2.1: | Law

P2Q2Response2.docx P2 Q2 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/17/2025 Ronae Circumstantial physical evidence can provide more information that direct evidence could be missing making it preferred or more reliable than direct evidence. In certain scenarios where direct evidence is unavailable, circumstantial physical evidence can help the investigation by establishing a timeline. Direct evidence independently establishes or disproves facts, while circumstantial evidence supports them through inference. Most forensic crime scene evidence is circumstantial (Vecchi, 2004). A case...

Law

Post 1.1: | Law

P1Q1Response2.docx P1 Q1 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/17/2025 Elliot When agencies compete for control over the same investigation, mechanisms like the establishment of lead agencies, interagency protocols, or the appointment of special counsels are essential are critical. Ensuring investigative integrity requires clear communication. In addition, role delineation and transparency help to prevent conflicts or redundancies. Memos of understanding can formalize agreements on resource allocation for evidence handling and reporting responsibilities. To foster effective coll...

Law

Discussion 2 : | Law

Discussion2.docx 500 word response 2 references/intext citations Due 1/15/2025 Major Question Doctrine A recent and critically important administrative law doctrine is being established by the US Supreme Court over the last 5 years culminating in the case of  Biden v. Nebraska site.  where the high court struck down the US Department of Education's regulations forging portions of their student loan debt.  Here is some commentary on the "Major Questions Doctrine" as to its application to the student loan case decision: https://jacobin.com/2023/08/supreme-...

Law

Response 2.2: | Law

response2.2.docx 100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Shroeder Post 2 Q2: The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is the better route. This is because integrity and having multiple different people on the case are more beneficial. Having more than one other person allows for group work to consider multiple theories rather than being tunnel vision. This allows for...

Law

JOURNAL 4 : All questions are worth 20 points: ... | Law

All questions are worth 20 points: Explain the Zimbardo experiment and what it might imply for correctional professionals. Is the parole officer’s role to help the parolee stay out of prison or is it to simply identify any violation? If the parolee stumbles should the officers promptly return them to prison? You are a prison psychologist, and during the course of your counseling session with one drug offender, he confesses that he has been using drugs. Obviously, this is a serious violation of prison rules. What might you do to handle this problem?  Would you want to meet with the murderer of...

Law

MEDDQ2:   Question #1: Chapter 3 provides a... | Law

Question #1: Chapter 3 provides a general overview of various types of mediation and various approaches mediators can take. What scriptural principles does the information in this chapter bring to mind? Question #2: Please answer the discussion questions found on p. 94 of F&S (Under the sentence, "As you watch them, consider the following questions."

Law

Lorem: assignment  | Law

assignment  assignment.docx Discussion #1 From your Chapter 1 readings, discuss the following question: Contrast the role of crime with the role of politics in the growth of corrections. Why is this contrast important? Write a thoughtful and thorough post. Your post must be posted by January 28, 2024, no later than 10:00 PM. There is a minimum 300-word requirement to discuss your response thoroughly. Be sure you properly cite your sources and any other academic sources you might reference. In-text citations should give the author(s) last name and page number of the publication, and a biblio...

Law

Discussion 4: | Law

Discussion4.docx 500 word response with references/intext citations Posting #1  Due Wednesday 1/29/2025 Find the case that is next to the letter that matches your first letter of your last name.  Matthew v. Elderidge https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3668695 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9haISi1Fwcg&list=PLDBNYJzmNnKvewkIroCtiF8zq0Wxy6NAb&index=41 Now go to that case, read it and become the “expert” on that case for the class.   You can also play the video summary and explanation of that case to help you understand it.  Note that many of our cases can be read...

Law

WOULD I DEFEND HIM?: Listen to the podcast: Radiolab, The... | Law

Listen to the podcast: Radiolab, The Buried Bodies Case If you were a lawyer, are there certain defendants you simply would not represent? Why/why not? What about the client they talk about in the podcast? Would you defend him? Why/why not?