Psychology Verified Ph.D. Review

Introduction - Capstone project (empirical) or review type (review)

Research Requirement:

Please help with assignment  NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx NOTE FROM INSTRUCTOR You want to make sure there are enough (E.g., at least 30??) articles empirically examining this relationship (online mental health sessions/support and benefits to mental health) before selecting it. When doing your review, be sure to pay attention to the way you need to search for articles. You must follow an iterative approach, once you decide on your general topic. Eventually you will create a research question that the review article outcomes (aka "data") can answer. webinformationwithvideo.docx Please watch and read 1. Literature Review: Developing a search strategy https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies 2. Literature Review: Traditional or narrative literature reviews https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx Instructions Empirical projects: Please upload your Introduction for your proposal to this drop box (empirical). I don't expect it to be complete! If you already have a method, you can upload them together as one document and I will provide feedback using the "Intro and Method" rubric. Note that people beginning new projects my not have anything to submit for several weeks. Review projects: Once you have read the literature review information, please complete   THIS REVIEW TEMPLATE  to help guide you in your review decisions. Then, please include the following in the template document and submit to "Introduction - Capstone (empirical) OR review type (review)" assignment folder (above). 1) your topic, including important variables. No do not need to formulate your question yet, but indicate the general area, such as effective treatments for schizophrenic patients, or communication styles between men and women, so I know what to expect; 2)   document that you have looked at the literature and ensured there are enough peer-reviewed empirical articles published on the topic to warrant a review on the topic three references (minimum) you found from your search. Please provide search terms used to locate articles and a screen shot of your library search that shows the number of peer-reviewed articles relevant to the topic you've chosen located in your search; and 3) links to three articles you think look promising for your lit review project. Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx The purpose or aim of the literature review. THIS VIDEO  does an excellent job explaining literature reviews and how to perform one. Start here! See below for a brief list of possible purposes of a literature review.  A literature review, as part of a thesis or for any other publication, should demonstrate your knowledge of the research has been conducted in the past and should place your research in the context of this work. A thesis is an original and significant piece of work that adds to the body of knowledge in a particular field. A literature review can have a number of purposes within a thesis. These include: · demonstrating and clarify your understanding of your field of research; · identifying patterns and trends in the literature; · identifying gaps in the literature and seek new lines of inquiry; · identifying similarities and differences in previous research and place you work in perspective; · justifying your own research; · increasing your breadth of knowledge of your subject area; · identifying seminal and influential published works in your field; · identifying relevant journals, publishers and conferences to search; · providing the intellectual context for your own work, enabling you to position your project relative to other work; · identifying experts working in your field (a researcher network is a valuable resource); · carrying on from where others have already reached THIS VIDEO · Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU&t=138s protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc Protocol template Protocol Template: Literature Review 1. Background I. Important characteristics What are the important population and/or characteristics (diagnostic criteria, minors -age/stage of development, adults on the Autism spectrum, etc.)? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Relevance Does the review topic have important implications (individual and/or public), e. g. can be applied for education, health, business, etc.? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Rationale Does the evidence (including existing systematic reviews) fail to answer the review question, and why? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV. Justification Is the need for the review justified in the light of the potential health or other implications and current limitations of the evidence base? What are the inclusion / exclusion criteria? ______________________________________________________________________________ Will you impose any additional limits, e.g. language, publication type, study design? ______________________________________________________________________________ How will study selection be performed (will you search and get a maximum number or articles and then pare them down, or will you search for specifics and add on? For the purposes of this project, you should use the former unless you have a god reason -talk to your instructor!)? ______________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1
Expert Dissertation Preview for Introduction - Capstone project (empirical) or review type (review)
Thesis Icon

Master Thesis Solutions

Full Scholarly Analysis & Citations

APA 7th Ready Ph.D. Verified Seminal Works Included

Why Postgraduate Students Trust Us

01. Deep Scholarly Search

We don't just use Google Scholar. We access premium databases to find the high-impact journals your supervisor expects.

02. Critical Engagement

Our writers provide genuine synthesis and critique, moving beyond simple summary to show true academic mastery.

03. Zero Plagiarism Policy

Every literature review is written from scratch. We provide a full Turnitin report to guarantee the originality of your work.

04. 24/7 Ph.D. Support

Our support team understands postgraduate rigor and is available around the clock to assist with your thesis requirements.

Research FAQ: Psychology

How can I use this literature review sample properly?

Use this sample as a guide for thematic organization, scholarly tone, and citation density. Observe how our experts link different studies to build a cohesive argument. Do not copy it directly; instead, use it to inspire your own original research.

Can you help with a Dissertation Proposal in Psychology?

Yes. We specialize in research proposals. We can help you define a gap in the literature, formulate robust research questions, and outline a methodology that will satisfy even the most rigorous academic committee.

What is the standard turnaround time for a Master's thesis chapter?

Standard dissertation chapters (3,000-5,000 words) typically require 4-7 days for thorough research and scholarly writing. For the literature review chapter, more time is often needed to ensure an exhaustive search of sources.

Further Reading & Similar Studies

Psychology

Feedback Candice:   Program evaluation is a critical... | Psychology

Program evaluation is a critical procedure that is used to ascertain whether the community-based mental health services deliver their desired results or not. Assessments bring out evidence to enhance service delivery, accountability and resource allocation. The outpatient anxiety treatment program in the Grand Concourse Counseling Center seeks to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions that were implemented to minimize anxiety and enhance the functioning of the clients in the community. By examining such programs, the progress is not only measured, but obstacles and areas of improvement are...

Psychology

Collaborative Learning Community

Assessment DescriptionThis is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. Before beginning this assignment, each group should submit a filled-in copy of the CLC Agreement Form. Each CLC team will design a correlational study, groups will need two variables with at least five sets of data. between these two variables: time spent playing video games and aggression. Then in 1000 words, do the following: Create a hypothesis for the group’s study. Consider the hypothesis and how the group will define operationally and measure the variables. Describe how the group will obtain a random samp...

Psychology

Psychology CST Assignment Asynchronous: Dialogical Communication & Buber

https://www.uwlax.edu/globalassets/offices-services/murphy-learning-center/public-speaking-tutors/new-folder/new-folder/psc-handout---dialogic-communication.pdfLinks to an external site. Above is a chart that illustrates dialogical communication and addresses its communicative sensibilities.  See the clip: Buber on Dialogical Communication.  UP TO 5.34 min https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16Cr82mLhkw&t=207s  Links to an external site. Here are the questions you should be able to answer and discuss with your group: All responses must be supported by  chapter 4.  You may also use the chapter on d...

Psychology

QR&A Week 1 Discussion: Post a very brief description (1–3... | Psychology

Post a very brief description (1–3 sentences) of the article you found and address the following: Describe how you think the research in the article is useful (e.g., what population is it helping? What problem is it solving?). Using Y=f(X) +E notation, identify the independent and dependent variables. How might the research models presented be wrong? What types of error might be present in the reported research? Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Psychology

Can this be done by 1pm tomorrow?

Authors:Story, William T. a, ∗ Tura, Halkeno a Rubin, Jason b Engidawork, Belaynesh c Ahmed, Anwar c Jundi, Feysel c Iddosa, Teshale c Abrha, Teweldebrhan Hailu cAffiliation:a Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA b PCI-USA, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA c PCI-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaSource:In Social Science & Medicine January 2017Publisher:Elsevier LtdKeywords:Ethiopia Social capital Disaster preparedness women's empowerment EvaluationAbstract:Ethiopia is faced with challenges posed by natural dis...

Psychology

Reply 6-1 SJ

Between-subjects allows us to compare two or more groups that are given two different treatments.  Within-subjects allows us to observe a group of participants over a course of time during a process. Using the between-subjects allows us to collect data at a faster rate and thus avoid our participants to become bored or lose interest in participation due to becoming exhausted of having to repeat the experiment more than once. Although within-subjects is a risk for losing participants over exhaustion, it allows us to test the same participants so we avoid other factors interfering with the resul...

Psychology

apl4

Test anxiety affects many college-aged students.  Do you think your anxiety level is different for in-person vs. on-line tests?  Why or why not?  To end this APL, describe a study that could examine this experimentally. Make sure to specify your independent and dependent variables.

Psychology

3215

(Note: If you are uncomfortable providing your actual scores in the public forum, please don't. However, you should send me the scores via IM or email so I know you did complete the assignment and get credit). For the post, you need to discuss and analyze your scores by comparison - compare your scores to the average of at least two other categories; to males/females; other countries  -- you select who or what you find interesting to compare to but more importantly, provide reasons why you chose those categories and what you expected to find in your comparison (with reasons based in psychologi...

Psychology

Assigment

For this assignment, I want everyone to break a social norm. Then you will discuss how breaking the norm made you feel, and how it might have made other people feel. Step 1: First you need to identify a social norm. Some examples are: • Appearance (you can wear pink slippers to school or around town instead of shoes; put a blue dot on the tip of your nose; wear your shirt backward / inside-out; overdo your makeup) • Interpersonal Behavior (stand too close or too far away from someone you are talking too; avoid eye contact; scoff at a person’s every comment) • Social Etiquette (violate elevator...